 |
Church Energy Efficiency
Calvary
United Methodist Church
Annapolis, MD
The mission of Calvary United Methodist Church
in Annapolis, Maryland, is to impact people’s
lives: to promote education, fellowship, worship
and outreach. But in 1987, high energy bills threatened
the church’s day school and child care program.
Since the school operated every day, it was assumed
that it was culprit behind Calvary’s high
energy costs.
When Mary Jean Baker, a member of the Education
Commission, analyzed the church’s electric
bills, however, she discovered that at least half
the charges were due to the fact that the utility
company set the church’s rates according
to “demand” -- the highest half
hour of electricity usage during the month. The
real energy culprits turned out to be the entire
congregation.
An Energy Conservation Committee was formed to
try to gain control of energy demand. The committee’s
initial efforts were low-tech. Mary Jean chaired
an Idea Exchange, gathering representatives from
each program sponsored by the church to discuss
ways to save energy. The committee also asked
experts from the local utility for suggestions.
Summer demand was reduced by restricting midday
activities during the week, using old clock timers
to schedule energy use, and “running around
turning things off.” After making some improvements
and writing a report, the committee was disbanded.
|
 |
But soon after, much of the energy savings disappeared
as usage of the church building began to increase.
It was time for a step up in technology. Mary
Jean began shopping for an electronic energy monitor.
This device enabled the church to automatically
manage the heating and cooling system to control
demand, schedule machinery and outside lighting
more efficiently, and gather data on how the building
utilized energy.
People now were free to schedule activities whenever
they wanted. In 1994, the church knew they were
on the right track when they were able to manage
a very large funeral, during Vacation Bible School,
on a hot summer day with an energy demand of only
94 kilowatts. The goal had been to keep weekday
demand below 100 kilowatts.
By 1997, Mary Jean realized that the building’s
use had doubled in the past ten years with only
a small increase in energy consumption. “To
me,” Mary Jean says, “efficiency depends
on the amount of fruit per unit of input. We can’t
measure spiritual growth, per se. We can measure
energy demand and energy consumption. We know
that there were more people engaged in more activities
which they claim were meaningful, while there
had been little change in monetary costs for energy.”
|